<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Brian Frank's Blog - Latest Comments in Smarter Twitter Lists Make Smarter People</title><link>http://brianfrank.disqus.com/</link><description>Writer and creative generalist in London, Ontario.</description><atom:link href="https://brianfrank.disqus.com/smarter_twitter_lists_make_smarter_people/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:37:05 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Smarter Twitter Lists Make Smarter People</title><link>http://brianfrank.ca/2009/11/smarter-twitter-lists-make-smarter-people/#comment-22060462</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with @billdeys that Twitter was very late to the game with this "enhancement" to it's service. Personally, I'll continue to generate my own private lists using PHP. Twitter should stick to improving it's core service and leave it to 3rd-party developers to provide the enhancements via the Twitter API.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Greg Fowler</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:37:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Smarter Twitter Lists Make Smarter People</title><link>http://brianfrank.ca/2009/11/smarter-twitter-lists-make-smarter-people/#comment-21539457</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ee - I know - I've found it tough representing a company when sometimes &lt;i&gt;it doesn't matter&lt;/i&gt; if you're taking the most objective &amp;amp; fair position in the world, it's what people perceive...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm thinking of playing with a few picky-lists in private while I sort of calibrate the criteria and decide if it's actually worth it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian Frank</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 13:01:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Smarter Twitter Lists Make Smarter People</title><link>http://brianfrank.ca/2009/11/smarter-twitter-lists-make-smarter-people/#comment-21535482</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I definitely agree with your point that lists should be objective. This is why I treading very carefully when creating lists for @voicesdotcom - I've created a list of voice actors in general (like Jay Rosen I made a call for those who should be included to @ me and will do so again in the coming weeks), but I feel that there is value in creating a sort-of sub-list of the major VO players on Twitter, BUT I don't want to play favorites...wow. The more I think about it the more tricky it becomes. It can be difficult to be seen as objective when you're representing a company and serving and connecting with customers on Twitter.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ericablonde</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 11:52:34 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>